Validation of suPAR turbidimetric assay on Cobas® (c502 and c702) and comparison to suPAR ELISA.

Thor A Skovsted,Eva Rabing Brix Petersen, Maj-Britt Fruekilde,Andreas Kristian Pedersen, Tomasz Pielak,Jesper Eugen-Olsen

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL & LABORATORY INVESTIGATION(2020)

引用 7|浏览15
暂无评分
摘要
suPAR is a plasma marker of chronic inflammation, and an elevated suPAR is consistently associated with worse outcome in a variety of clinical conditions. Quantification of suPAR is useful for determining patient risk in triage, but there is no fast automatized method for quick determination of suPAR. We developed and validated a rapid latex particle-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay for quantification of plasma suPAR on the c502 and the c702 Roche Cobas (R) 8000 measurment systems. The turbidimetric assay was validated against the suPARnostic (R) ELISA (ViroGates, Denmark). This validation demonstrates suPAR can be analysed by turbidimetry giving very similar results (<15% difference) compared to the ELISA method and the observed correlations (n = 103) were strong, r > 0.95. Roche Cobas (R) 8000 instruments demonstrated repeatability and repoducibility, CV % at 3.4-4.1 and 5.7-11.4, respectively. The estimated limit of detection was 1.30 mu g/L and 1.31 mu g/L for the Cobas (R) c502 and c702, respectively. Dilution tests showed linearity of suPAR from 1.8 to 26.5 mu g/L. The acceptable concentrations of Bilirubin, Intralipid and Hemoglobin, were 350 mu mol/L, 3.3 g/L and 1.4 g/L, respectively. suPAR can be quantified reproducibly within 10 min using a turbidimetry assay. This assay is faster than ELISA with similar results, making it suitable for clinical routine analysis.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Receptors,soluble urokinase plasminogen activator,validation studies,immunoturbidimetry assay,ELISA,biomarker
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要