The Influence of Different Modelling Factors on Global Temperature and Pressure Models and Their Performance in Different Zenith Hydrostatic Delay (ZHD) Models.

Surface temperature and pressure are indispensable variables in Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) meteorology. The lack of meteorological observations located at or near the GNSS sites is a big challenge for the calculation of accurate zenith hydrostatic delay (ZHD). Therefore, various empirical models with different model forms were established to provide temperature and pressure values. In this study, the influence of different modelling factors, including model forms, temporal resolution of the data sources, and the spatial resolution of the data sources, is evaluated and the temperature and pressure model with the best performance is developed. On the basis of the meteorological parameters estimated by the above model, we analyzed the global performance of the three most commonly used ZHD models, that is, the Saastamoinen, Hopfield, and Black models. The numerical results show that the model with the idea of time-segmented modelling performs best, of which the global mean root mean square (RMS), mean absolute error (MAE), and standard deviation (SD) are 7.87/6.33/7.17 hPa and 2.95/2.31/2.79 K for pressure and temperature, respectively, using the data sources with temporal resolution of 2 h and spatial resolution of 2.5 degrees x 2 degrees in the reanalysis data comparison. In comparison with the radiosonde data, the mean RMS/MAE/SD are 7.02/5.24/6.46 hPa and 4.05/3.17/3.86 K for pressure and temperature, respectively. The Saastamoinen model with a global mean bias/RMS of 1.01/16.9 mm achieved the best ZHD estimated values compared with the other two ZHD models.