Evidence-practice gap in the preprocedural risk assessment for contrast-induced acute kidney injury

Abstract Background Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is one of the frequently encountered and costly complications after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Clinical practice guidelines strongly recommend that PCI patients should universally undergo preprocedural assessment for the risk of CI-AKI, and the contrast volume (CV) should be minimized to an achievable level, particularly among the high AKI risk patients. However, data on the CV use based on the comprehensive preprocedural risk assessment is still lacking. Purpose Our study aimed to 1) assess the impact of CV increase with the incidence of AKI among high AKI risk patients, and 2) retrospectively evaluate the used CV based on the preprocedural comprehensive risk assessment for patients undergoing PCI within multicenter longitudinal registry. Methods Between 2009 and 2018, 22,373 patients underwent PCI in 14 participating facilities, and consecutive patient data was registered. AKI was defined as a >0.3mg/dl absolute or >1.5-fold relative increase in post-PCI creatinine or new initiation of dialysis, based on the Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria. The post-procedural creatinine was defined as the highest value within 30 days after the indexed procedure. Congruent with the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) definition, if more than 1 post-procedural creatinine level was measured, the highest value was used for determining AKI. We divided the patients into four groups according to quartile of NCDR AKI risk scores. Results Mean age of the patients were 68.7±11.1 years, and 79.1% were male. Mean CV use was 161.4±74.8ml. The incidence of CI-AKI was 8.9%, and was particularly high among high AKI risk patients (21.1%); CV (per 1ml linear increase) was directly associated with the occurrence of AKI (OR: 1.002 per unit in CV; 95% CI: 1.001–1.003; P<0.001) in these patients. CV during PCI decreased with the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD), but it did not alter by the overall NCDR AKI risk score (Figure). After multivariable adjustment, CV was predicted by stage of CKD (−13.68ml; 95% CI: −12.05 to −15.30ml; P<0.001), but not by the value of pre-procedure prediction score (NCDR AKI risk score, P=0.575). CV according to CKD/NCDR AKI risk score Conclusions Higher CV was directly associated with the occurrence of AKI among higher AKI risk patients. However, CV use was largely influenced by the stage of renal disease, and not with overall patient risk presented by contemporary risk scores. Our results have identified an important evidence-practice gap and emphasizes the importance of total preprocedural assessment to minimize CV and prevent subsequent AKI. Acknowledgement/Funding KAKENHI (16KK0186, 16H05215, 25460630, 25460777), Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Teikoku Seiyaku, Sumitomo Dainippon, AstraZeneka, Pfizer