Assessment of cartilage repair quality with the international cartilage repair society score and the oswestry arthroscopy score.

The International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) score and the Oswestry Arthroscopic Score (OAS) have been validated to evaluate repair tissue quality. However, the performance of these scores has not been studied in typical patients undergoing cartilage repair and who have lesions of varying sizes. In this study, we compared the performance of the ICRS and the OAS scores and analyzed the effect of lesion characteristics on the performance of these two scores. Cartilage repair quality was assessed in a total of 104 arthroscopic observations of cartilage repair sites of the knee in 62 patients after autologous chondrocyte implantation. Two observers scored the repair areas independently with the ICRS and the OAS scores. The performance of both scores was evaluated according to internal consistency and inter-rater reliability and correlation between the scores. The frequency and proportion of disagreements were analyzed according to the repair site area and the given score. The correlation between the scores was good (r = 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87-0.94). Both scores showed moderate internal consistency and inter-rater reliability. Cronbach's alpha was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.80-0.92) for the ICRS score and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.70-0.86) for the OAS score. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.84-0.92) for the ICRS and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.74-0.87) for the OAS scores. The frequency and proportion of disagreements were higher in larger repair sites. In arthroscopic use, both ICRS and OAS scores perform similarly, however, their reliability deteriorates as the lesion size increases. (c) 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res