THU0449 EFFECT MODERATION OF ANALGESIC TREATMENT OUTCOMES BY DEPRESSION IN PERSONS WITH OR AT-RISK FOR SYMPTOMATIC KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES(2019)

引用 0|浏览14
暂无评分
摘要
Background Depression often accompanies knee osteoarthritis (OA), exacerbates pain severity, and may negatively affect analgesic treatment outcomes. Objectives To determine whether depression moderates the effect of analgesics on pain severity in persons with or at-risk for symptomatic knee OA. Methods Participants (n=2059) were from the Osteoarthritis Initiative, with or at-risk for symptomatic knee OA, and had complete data on selected measures at baseline and four annual follow-up visits. Analgesic initiation (acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids) was assessed at three annual follow-up visits in those who were not analgesic users at baseline. Depression was evaluated concurrent to assessment of analgesic use with the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) scale using the corresponding CES-D screening threshold (CES-D score ≥ 16). Pain severity at the fourth annual follow-up visit was the outcome and measured with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain scale (rescaled range = 0-100). Time-invariant confounders measured at baseline were: age, gender, race, education, marital status, employment, health insurance, smoking, alcohol consumption, Charlson comorbidity index, and symptomatic knee OA status. Time-varying confounders measured at three annual follow-up visits were: WOMAC pain score, Kellgren-Lawrence grade, body mass index, physical performance, knee injuries, and knee injections. Structural nested mean models appropriate for evaluating time-varying effect moderation of dynamic treatments by evolving effect modifiers were implemented using an inverse-probability-of-treatment-weighting regression-with-residuals approach. Results In non-depressed participants, analgesic treatment effect at years one, two, and three on pain severity at year four was minimal (Figure 1). Time-specific associations in the non-depressed ranged from -1.18 (95% CI: -2.94, 0.59) to 0.81 (95% CI: -0.99, 2.61) and were not statistically significant. The persistent use of analgesics at years one and two (β = -2.17; 95% CI: -4.62, 0.27) or years one, two, and three (β = -1.36; 95% CI: -4.22, 1.50) did not increase the magnitude of the treatment effect in non-depressed participants. In contrast, time-specific associations in depressed participants increased during follow-up from 0.61 (95% CI: -9.17, 10.38) to -9.64 (95% CI: -17.96, -1.33), and the treatment effect of year three analgesic use on year four pain severity was statistically significant. The magnitude of the treatment effect increased from year one with persistent analgesic use at years one and two (β = -5.75; 95% CI: -20.65, 9.15) and years one, two, and three (β = -15.39; 95% CI: -33.99, 3.21). However, effect moderation was only significant concerning year three analgesic use, where the subsequent difference in treatment effect between depressed and non-depressed participants was -10.46 (95% CI: -18.97, -1.94). Conclusion Findings indicate a significantly greater one-year treatment effect of analgesic use that lowered pain severity in persons with or at-risk for symptomatic knee OA who also had depression. Thus, knee OA patients with depression may derive more benefit from analgesic treatment for chronic pain than non-depressed patients, perhaps because their pain is undertreated in routine clinical practice. Acknowledgement This study was supported by the Rheumatology Research Foundation’s Scientist Development Award. Disclosure of Interests Alan Rathbun: None declared, Michelle Shardell: None declared, Joseph Gallo: None declared, Alice Ryan: None declared, Elizabeth Stuart: None declared, Megan Schuler: None declared, Michelle Yau: None declared, Marc Hochberg Shareholder of: BriOri Biotech, Theralogix LLC., Consultant for: Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Novartis Pharma AG, Pfizer Inc., Samumed LLC, Symic Bio Inc., Theralogix LLC, TissueGene Inc., TLC Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., Zynerba, Galapagos, IQVIA, Hoffman LaRoche.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要