Are Vidas (R) Anti-Hev Igm And Igg Assays Fit For Reliable Diagnosis Of Hepatitis E Virus Infections? Comparison & Case Story Telling

Objectives: Hepatitis E virus (HEV) genotype 3 is an emerging pathogen in developed countries. We evaluated the performance of two new serological assays for the detection of HEV, VIDAS (R) anti-HEV IgM and IgG. Methods: VIDAS (R) assays were performed on 77 clinical samples: 68 samples from patients suspected for HEV infection and 9 samples which previously tested positive for HEV IgM, IgG or HEV PCR. All samples were also tested using Wantai HEV assays. Cross-reactivity was assessed. To get a better view on the natural course of HEV infections, three clinical cases are described. Results: The concordance rate between VIDAS (R) and Wantai assays was good for HEV IgM (0.75,CI 0.52-0.98) and very good for HEV IgG (0.85,CI 0.72-0.98). Four samples tested borderline/positive with Wantai IgM but negative with VIDAS (R) IgM. All of these samples were HEV RNA negative, HEV IgG was positive in 2/4 samples. Five samples produced conflicting HEV IgG results. These tested positive with VIDAS (R) but negative with Wantai IgG. All five samples were HEV IgM and RNA negative. We detected no cross-reactivity. The clinical cases illustrate that HEV serology can still be negative in the very beginning of an acute infection. Conclusions: There is a good agreement between VIDAS (R) and Wantai anti-HEV IgM and IgG assays. Discrepant HEV IgM results probably reflect false positive Wantai IgM results (RNA-/IgG- samples) and longer-lasting positive Wantai IgM (RNA-/IgG+ samples). Discrepant HEV IgG results, could either represent resolved HEV infections (false negative Wantai IgG results) or false positive VIDAS (R) HEV IgG results.