Supplier financing service decisions for a capital-constrained supply chain: Trade credit vs. combined credit financing

JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION(2020)

引用 5|浏览6
暂无评分
摘要
In practice, suppliers and third-party logistics providers sometimes both offer credit in supply chain financing. To examine the supplier's financing decision, we firstly design a multiple-participant supply chain finance system comprising a supplier, a capital-constrained retailer, and a 3PL firm. Secondly, we compare combined credit financing (CCF), which includes both the supplier's partial trade credit and the 3PL firm's credit with trade credit financing (TCF), to analyze the supplier's optimal decision given the retailer's initial capital level and immediate payment coefficient. Thirdly, we consider the operational and financial parameters to obtain the optimal decisions of supply chain participants under both TCF and CCF. Finally, we perform a numerical analysis of the retailer's initial capital level and immediate payment coefficient. The results show that: when the retailer's initial capital level is low or the retailer's capital constraint is insignificant, the supplier will choose TCF; otherwise, the supplier would better choose CCF. It is more profitable for the supplier to cooperate with a retailer with limited assets under both TCF and CCF. Moreover, we obtained the threshold level of the retailer's initial capital to ensure the retailer's participation and the immediate payment coefficient that ensures the 3PL firm's participation under CCF.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Partial trade credit,capital constraint,supply chain finance (SCF),third-party logistics (3PL),financing mode choice
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要