FRI0567 The diagnostic value of autoantibody isotypes in rheumatoid arthritis

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES(2018)

引用 0|浏览21
暂无评分
摘要
Background Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) and rheumatoid factor (RF) are the most specific diagnostic markers of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). These antibodies are predominantly of the IgG (ACPA) or IgM (RF) isotype. Other subtypes of both antibodies – such as IgA – and other autoantibodies like RA33 have been repeatedly reported but their diagnostic value has still not been fully elucidated. Objectives To investigate the diagnostic value of IgA, IgG and IgM subtypes of RF, ACPA and RA33 antibodies in patients with RA and their potential predictive value regarding therapeutic response to methotrexate (MTX). Methods To determine the diagnostic specificity and sensitivity, sera from 290 RA patients (including 165 MTX starter), 261 disease controls and 100 healthy subjects were tested for the presence of IgA, IgG and IgM isotypes of RF, ACPA and RA33 by EliATM (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cut-offs for prototype anti-RA33 (IgA, IgG and IgM) and the IgM-ACPA EliATM were calculated by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis against disease controls and healthy subjects. In addition, RF and ACPA had been routinely measured by nephelometry and the anti-CCP EliATM, respectively. Results The most specific antibodies were IgG and IgA-ACPA as well as IgG-RF, closely followed by IgG- and IgA-RA33 while IgM isotypes were found to be less specific. However, IgM-RF was the most sensitive isotype (65%) followed by IgG-ACPA (59.5%) and IgA-RF (50.7%). Other subtypes were less prevalent ranging from 35% (IgA-ACPA) to 6% (IgA-RA33). Concerning RA33 antibodies, 14 patients were positive for IgA- and 18 for IgG-RA33. Interestingly, the major RA33 subtype was IgM which was detected in 43 patients. However, in contrast to RF and ACPA the overlap between the RA33 isotypes was marginal. RA33 antibodies as well as IgA-RF and IgA-ACPA were found to increase the diagnostic sensitivity of serological testing since they were found also in 22% of seronegative patients. Moreover, analysing IgM-RF by EliATM proved more sensitive than RF measured by nephelometry which further reduced the number of seronegative patients. Thus, additional antibodies were detected in 30% of the seronegative population and, importantly, most patients had several antibodies, in contrast to disease controls which generally showed only one antibody species. The majority of antibody positive RA patients was found to be triple positive for RF, ACPA and either IgA-RF or IgA-ACPA. Among the 64 RA33 positive patients 48 were also positive for IgA-RF and/or IgA-ACPA (figure 1). Interestingly, we found high levels of IgM-RF (>124 IU/ml) to be associated with achieving a SDAI50 response to MTX (17 of 24 cases). Furthermore, also the presence of RA33 antibodies was associated with a MTX response as 50% of RA33 positive patients (n=32) achieved a SDAI50 response compared to 34% in the RA33 negative population (p=0.034). Conclusions Thus, increasing the number of antibodies in serological routine testing would provide valuable additional information allowing to better distinguish between RA and other rheumatic disorders also in patients negative in current routine diagnostics and may provide valuable additional information regarding the prediction of treatment responses. Disclosure of Interest D. Sieghart: None declared, A. Platzer: None declared, P. Studenic: None declared, F. Alasti: None declared, M. Grundhuber Employee of: Thermo Fisher Scientific, Phadia GmbH, S. Swiniarski Employee of: Thermo Fisher Scientific, Phadia GmbH, S. Blueml: None declared, H. Haslacher: None declared, J. Smolen: None declared, G. Steiner: None declared
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要