Pre‐fibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis vs. WHO‐defined essential thrombocythemia: The impact of minor clinical diagnostic criteria on the outcome of the disease

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY(2017)

引用 49|浏览11
暂无评分
摘要
The 2016 revised WHO criteria for the diagnosis of pre-fibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis (pre-PMF) require at least one of the following four borderline expressed minor clinical criteria: anemia, leukocytosis, elevated lactate dehydrogenase and splenomegaly. In this study, we evaluated the relative frequency of these four criteria in a group of 170 pre-PMF patients and compared them to 225 ET cases. More than 91% of pre-PMF cases showed one or more of these features required for diagnosis, by contrast with only 48% of ET patients. According to clinical data the cumulative risk of progression to advanced/overt PMF in pre-PMF was 36.9% after 15 years. After fitting cox regression models to analyze the impact of the minor criteria on overall survival, only leukocytosis remained as a significant predictor of survival in both pre-PMF and ET. Molecular characterization showed differences in survival in pre-PMF but not ET, with CALR being a more favorable mutation than JAK2. The different outcome of pre-PMF versus ET and associated molecular genetic data supports the concept of two different entities, rather than a continuum of the same disease. Although slightly less than 50% of ET patients also show one or more minor clinical criteria, accurate distinction between ET and pre-PMF is possible by following an integrated approach including histomorphological diagnosis and presence of minor clinical criteria.
更多
查看译文
关键词
pre-fibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis,essential thrombocythemia,minor clinical diagnostic criteria,who-defined
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要