Abstract 17512: Differences in Hospital Risk-standardized Mortality Rates for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention by Patient Age Group: Implications for Hospital Outcome Profiling

Circulation(2016)

引用 23|浏览14
暂无评分
摘要
Introduction: Hospital 30-day risk-standardized mortality rates (RSMRs) for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), a marker of PCI quality, are only calculated for Medicare beneficiaries ≥65 years-old. Whether these data also reflect hospital PCI quality for younger patients is unknown. Hypothesis: Hospital 30-day RSMRs for older patients ≥65 years-old undergoing PCI strongly correlate with 30-day RSMRs for younger patients Methods: We examined all PCI hospitalizations from 12/1/2011 to 11/30/2012 in the NCDR CathPCI registry linked to the National Death Index with direct identifiers. Hospital 30-day RSMRs for older and younger patients were calculated using two measures of 30-day mortality after PCI endorsed by the National Quality Forum. One was designed for patients with STEMI and/or cardiogenic shock (STEMI/shock) and the other was designed for patients without STEMI and without cardiogenic shock (no STEMI/no shock). We calculated the correlation of hospital 30-day RSMRs for older PCI patients with 30-day RSMRs for younger PCI patients among hospitals with ≥25 PCI patients in each age group for both STEMI/shock and no STEMI/no shock cohorts. Results: We identified 112,429 and 524,702 PCI hospitalizations with and without STEMI/shock, respectively (1357 hospitals). Median hospital 30-day RSMRs were 12.3% and 4.4% for older and younger PCI patients with STEMI/shock and 1.3% and 0.4% for older and younger PCI patients with no STEMI/no shock. Hospital 30-day RSMRs for older PCI patients were weakly correlated with 30-day RSMRs for younger PCI patients in both STEMI/shock and no STEMI/no shock cohorts (Pearson R=0.25 and 0.20, respectively) (Figure). Conclusions: Hospital 30-day RSMRs for older patients undergoing PCI poorly correlate with 30-day RSMRs for younger patients. Hospital outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries should therefore not be assumed to reflect hospital quality for all patient groups.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要