Opportunities to Improve Patient Engagement in Dialysis Decisions for Older Adults with Life-Limiting Kidney Disease

•Identify opportunities to improve patient engagement in decision making during visits with specialist providers.•Identify how the Best Case/Worst Case tool can help specialists improve patient engagement in conversations regarding life-sustaining treatments.•List key components of physician-patient conversations that promote patient engagement. Older adults who initiate dialysis often passively accept treatment without making an active choice to commit to life-supporting therapy. Interventional strategies that target the dialysis decision-making conversation between patients and their nephrologists may promote earlier access to palliative care, leading to better outcomes. To characterize communication about dialysis and evaluate the proof of concept of an intervention to change nephrologist communication. Pre/post-intervention study design. We recorded 16 outpatient conversations between nephrologists and patients age 70 and older with an eGFR≤20 mL/min/1.73 m2, not on dialysis. After recording the first 12 conversations, we trained seven nephrologists to use the Best Case/Worst Case (BC/WC) communication tool to describe treatment options and potential outcomes within the context of the patient's overall health. We used OPTION 5 and qualitative analysis to measure and characterize patient engagement in decision making before and after BC/WC training. Before training, OPTION 5 scores were low (median 20 out of 100 (IQR 15-35)), suggesting limited patient engagement in decision making. Nephrologists typically discussed lab values and considered when and how patients might receive dialysis. Few acknowledged the option of “no dialysis.” After training, nephrologists used BC/WC with fidelity and OPTION 5 scores increased (median 65 (IQR 50-76)). Using the BC/WC tool, nephrologists presented a choice between dialysis and supportive care without dialysis, described how dialysis and other health events might be experienced, provided prognostic information, and used phrases to elicit patients' goals. Currently nephrologists discuss the mode and timing of dialysis without disclosing prognosis or presenting dialysis as a choice. This leaves limited opportunity for patients to understand the role of supportive care or palliative care concurrent with dialysis. Interventions to support patient engagement in treatment decisions may improve access to palliative care.