Effectiveness of intensification therapies in Danes with Type 2 diabetes who use basal insulin: a population-based study.

AimsTo examine the usage and real-life effectiveness of intensification therapies in people with Type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin. MethodsWe used population-based healthcare databases in Denmark during 2000-2012 to identify all individuals with a first basal insulin prescription (with or without oral drugs), and evaluated subsequent intensification therapy with bolus insulin, premixed insulin or glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists. Poisson regression was used to compute the adjusted relative risks of reaching glycaemic control targets. ResultsWe included 7034 initiators of basal insulin (median age 64 years, diabetes duration 5.3 years, 84% with oral co-medication and median (interquartile range) pre-insulin HbA(1c) level 77 (65-92) mmol/mol [9.2% (8.1-10.6%)]. Of these, 3076 (43.7%) received intensification therapy after a median of 11 months: 58.5% with premixed insulin, 29.0% with bolus insulin, 10.6% with GLP-1 receptor agonists, and 1.9% with more than one add-on. Overall, 22% had attained an HbA(1c) level of < 53 mmol/mol (< 7%) by 3-6 months after intensification, while 38% attained an HbA(1c) < 58 mmol/mol (< 7.5%). Compared with premixed insulin intensification, attainment of HbA(1c) < 53 and < 58 mmol/mol was similar with bolus insulin add-on [adjusted relative risk 1.03 (95% CI 0.86-1.24) and 1.02 (95% CI 0.91-1.15), and higher for GLP-1 receptor agonist add-on [adjusted relative risk 1.56 (95% CI 1.27-1.92) and 1.27 (1.10-1.47)]. ConclusionsAmong people with Type 2 diabetes, 22 and 38% reached a target HbA(1c) < 53 mmol/mol (< 7%) or < 58 mmol/mol (< 7.5%), respectively, after intensification of their basal insulin therapy. Compared with premixed insulin, target attainment was similar with bolus insulin and higher with GLP-1 receptor agonists.