Comparison of six commercial tick-borne encephalitis IgM and IgG ELISA kits and the molecular characterization of their antigenic design.

Aurélie Velay,Morgane Solis,Heidi Barth, Véronique Sohn, Anne Moncollin, Amandine Neeb,Marie-Josée Wendling,Samira Fafi-Kremer

Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease(2017)

引用 5|浏览24
暂无评分
摘要
Tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) diagnosis is mainly based on the detection of viral-specific antibodies in serum. Several commercial assays are available, but published data on their performance remain unclear. We assessed six IgM and six IgG commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (ELISA-1 through ELISA-6) using 94 samples, including precharacterized TBEV-positive samples (n=50) and -negative samples (n=44). The six manufacturers showed satisfactory sensitivity and specificity and high overall agreement for both IgM and IgG. Three manufacturers showed better reproducibility and were the most sensitive (100%) and specific (95.5-98.1%) for both IgM and IgG. Two of them were also in agreement with the clinical interpretation in more than 90% of the cases. All the assays use inactivated virus as antigen, with strains showing approximately 94% homology at the amino acid level. The antigenic format of the assays was discussed to further improve this TBEV diagnostic tool.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要