Efficacy And Safety Of 12weeks Of Elbasvir +/- Grazoprevir +/- Ribavirin In Participants With Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 2, 4, 5 Or 6 Infection: The C-Scape Study

JOURNAL OF VIRAL HEPATITIS(2018)

引用 28|浏览23
暂无评分
摘要
People with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection other than genotype 1 represent a heterogeneous group. The aim of the phase 2 C-SCAPE study was to evaluate elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR), with or without ribavirin (RBV), in participants with HCV genotype 2, 4, 5 or 6 infection. This was a part randomised, open-label, parallel-group study (NCT01932762; PN047-03) of treatment-naive, noncirrhotic participants. Participants with HCV genotype 2 infection received GZR 100mg+RBV +/- EBR 50mg for 12weeks and those with genotype 4, 5 or 6 infection were randomized to receive EBR/GZR +/- RBV for 12weeks. The primary endpoint was sustained virological response 12 weeks after completion of treatment (SVR12; HCV RNA <25IU/mL). Among participants with genotype 2 infection, SVR12 was achieved by 80% (24/30) of those receiving EBR/GZR+RBV and 73% (19/26) of those receiving GZR+RBV. SVR rates were high in participants with HCV genotype 4 infection receiving EBR/GZR with and without RBV (100% [10/10] and 90% [9/10]; respectively). In contrast, the addition of RBV to EBR/GZR appeared to increase SVR12 in participants with genotype 5 infection (EBR/GZR, 25%; EBR/GZR+RBV 100% [4/4]). In participants with genotype 6 infection, SVR12 was 75% (3/4) in both those receiving EBR/GZR and those receiving EBR/GZR+RBV. The safety profile was similar across treatment arms, with adverse events tending to occur more frequently among participants receiving RBV. In conclusion, these data support the inclusion of participants with genotype 4 or 6 infection in the EBR/GZR phase 3 studies. EBR/GZR +/- RBV was unsatisfactory for participants with genotype 2 or 5 infection.
更多
查看译文
关键词
clinical trial, elbasvir, grazoprevir, hepatitis, ribavirin
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要