Hepatopulmonary syndrome: which blood gas analysis criteria and position should we use for diagnosis?

REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS(2017)

引用 8|浏览1
暂无评分
摘要
Introduction: Different blood gas criteria have been used in the diagnosis of hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS). Patients and methods: Arterial blood gases were prospectively evaluated in 194 cirrhotic candidates for liver transplantation (LT) in the supine and seated position. Three blood gas criteria were analyzed: classic (partial pressure of oxygen [PaO2] < 70 mmHg and/or alveolar-arterial gradient of oxygen [A-a PO2] >= 20 mmHg), modern (A-a PO2 >= 15 mmHg or >= 20 mmHg in patients over 64) and the A-a PO2 >= threshold value adjusted for age. Results: The prevalence of HPS in the supine and seated position was 27.8% and 23.2% (classic), 34% and 25.3% (modern) and 22.2% and 19% (adjusted for age), respectively. The proportion of severe and very severe cases increased in a seated position (11/49 [22.4%] vs 5/66 [7.6%], p = 0.02). No difference was observed in the pre-LT, post-LT and overall mortality in patients with HPS, regardless of the criteria used. Conclusion: Obtaining blood gas measurements in the supine position and the use of modern criteria are more sensitive for the diagnosis of HPS. Blood gas analysis with the patient seated detects a greater number of severe and very severe cases. The presence of HPS was not associated with an increase in mortality regardless of blood gas criterion used.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Cirrhosis,Ascites,Contrast echocardiography,Pulmonary vascular diseases,Macro-aggregated albumin lung perfusion scan and perioperative care
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要