Drug-Eluting or Bare-Metal Stents for Coronary Artery Disease.

Kaare H Bønaa,Jan Mannsverk,Rune Wiseth,Lars Aaberge, Yngvar Myreng, Ottar Nygård,Dennis W Nilsen, Nils-Einar Kløw, Michael Uchto, Thor Trovik, Bjørn Bendz, Sindre Stavnes, Reidar Bjørnerheim, Alf-Inge Larsen, Morten Slette,Terje Steigen, Ole J Jakobsen, Øyvind Bleie, Eigil Fossum,Tove A Hanssen, Øystein Dahl-Eriksen, Inger Njølstad, Knut Rasmussen,Tom Wilsgaard,Jan E Nordrehaug

The New England journal of medicine(2016)

引用 415|浏览41
暂无评分
摘要
BACKGROUND:Limited data are available on the long-term effects of contemporary drug-eluting stents versus contemporary bare-metal stents on rates of death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and stent thrombosis and on quality of life. METHODS:We randomly assigned 9013 patients who had stable or unstable coronary artery disease to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the implantation of either contemporary drug-eluting stents or bare-metal stents. In the group receiving drug-eluting stents, 96% of the patients received either everolimus- or zotarolimus-eluting stents. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause and nonfatal spontaneous myocardial infarction after a median of 5 years of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included repeat revascularization, stent thrombosis, and quality of life. RESULTS:At 6 years, the rates of the primary outcome were 16.6% in the group receiving drug-eluting stents and 17.1% in the group receiving bare-metal stents (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88 to 1.09; P=0.66). There were no significant between-group differences in the components of the primary outcome. The 6-year rates of any repeat revascularization were 16.5% in the group receiving drug-eluting stents and 19.8% in the group receiving bare-metal stents (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.85; P<0.001); the rates of definite stent thrombosis were 0.8% and 1.2%, respectively (P=0.0498). Quality-of-life measures did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS:In patients undergoing PCI, there were no significant differences between those receiving drug-eluting stents and those receiving bare-metal stents in the composite outcome of death from any cause and nonfatal spontaneous myocardial infarction. Rates of repeat revascularization were lower in the group receiving drug-eluting stents. (Funded by the Norwegian Research Council and others; NORSTENT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00811772 .).
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要