Abstract 8952: Results of the Pediatric Lead Extractability and Survival Evaluation (PLEASE) Study

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in children and congenital heart disease (CHD) patients is hampered by poor long-term lead survival. Lead extraction is technically difficult and carries substantial morbidity. Manufacturers developed distinct strategies for this issue: thinner lead bodies or a Gore ePTFE coil coating. Both design changes were thought to improve ease of lead removal, but have not been directly compared in children or adults. The purpose of this study was to assess thin and ePTFE-coated ICD lead survival in pediatric and CHD pts. Methods: The Pediatric Lead Extractability and Survival Evaluation (PLEASE) Study began as a Phase IV multicenter open-label prospective study [ NCT00335036 ], facilitated by the Pediatric & Congenital EP Society. Initially designed as a randomized study, it changed to a parallel assignment registry when 1 lead had an advisory due to high incidence of failure, prompting concern about continued clinical equipoise. Pediatric and CHD pts who underwent ICD lead implant from 2005-2010 were eligible. The end date was NCDR ICD Registry v2.0 release (includes pediatric & lead data). 23 centers participated; each site obtained IRB approval. De-identified data was sent to the PI center for verification and statistical analyses. Results: A total of 982 ICD pts (357 VVI, 558 DDD, 67 CRT-D) entered the PLEASE study, incl. 423 pts (43%) with CHD. Mean age at implant = 18.3 ± 9.9 yrs. Thin (< 7Fr) ICD leads accounted for 51%, 23% were ePTFE-coated, 26% neither thin nor coated. There were 113 ICD lead failures (11.5%) at a mean lead-age of 2.2 ± 1.7 yrs, causing shocks in 55 pts. Failure occurred in 21% of thin leads vs 3.5% of ePTFE leads (p<0.01). Extraction was performed on 142 (14.5%) leads overall; 21% of thin leads (incl. extraction of 29 functioning leads due to recall) vs. 4.4% of ePTFE leads (p<0.01). There were 7 major extraction complications (4.9%), but no procedural mortality. Among thin leads, 90/270 (33.3%) of recalled leads failed vs 15/229 (6.6%) non-recalled thin leads. Conclusions: This Phase IV study demonstrates that ICD leads in children and CHD pts have suboptimal performance overall. Thinner leads were much more likely to fail and/or be extracted compared with ePTFE leads, chiefly driven by one lead type.