Anaemia management with C.E.R.A. in routine clinical practice: OCEANE (Cohorte Mircera patients non-dialyses), a national, multicenter, longitudinal, observational prospective study, in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis.

BMJ OPEN(2013)

引用 22|浏览6
暂无评分
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the management of anaemia with a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C. E. R. A., methoxy polyethylene glycol epoetin-beta), in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) not on dialysis, nave or non-naive to treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) at inclusion. Design: National, multicentre, longitudinal, observational prospective study. Setting: 133 nephrologists practicing in France selected patients during their routine follow-up visits. The study was non-interventional. Participants: They were adult CKD patients not on dialysis or kidney transplant patients, nave or not to ESA treatment: 524 patients not on dialysis (48% ESA-naive) and 92 kidney transplant patients (24% ESA-naive) were included and followed up every 3 months during 1 year. Outcome measures: The two main endpoints were the percentage of patients who achieved target haemoglobin (Hb) levels as per European Medicines Agency guidelines (10-12 g/dl) around 6 months of treatment and modalities of treatment. Results: Approximately one in two patients had an Hb level within 10-12 g/dl at baseline, and around 6 and 12 months of treatment. Ninety per cent of ESA-naive patients achieved at least +1 g/dl increase over baseline Hb levels or had Hb within 10-12 g/dl around 6 and 12 months. The Hb level remained at approximately 11.5 g/dl during the 12 months of follow-up. Around 6 months: almost all patients were receiving a once-monthly subcutaneous dose of C. E. R. A. (patients not on dialysis: 95 +/- 54 mu g; kidney transplant patients: 121 +/- 70 mu g); approximately half the patients did not require a change in C. E. R. A. dose. Adverse effects related to C. E. R. A. were observed in less than 5% of patients and led to modification or discontinuation of treatment in 2%. Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of C. E. R. A. in CKD patients not on dialysis, with or without kidney transplantation, were confirmed in routine clinical practice.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要