Percutaneous saphenous vein graft interventions with and without distal filter wire protection.

BACKGROUND:Embolic protection during SVG interventions using distal balloon occlusion and aspiration has shown to reduce periprocedural complications compared to unprotected SVG interventions. A similar effect is expected from filter wires. PATIENTS AND METHODS:A total of 174 SVG interventions carried out with (group A; n=87) or without distal filter wire protection (group B; n=87) were retrospectively matched for the location of distal graft anastomosis and analyzed for baseline and procedural characteristics, for TIMI flow grade before and after PCI, for the post-procedural CK elevation, and for major adverse cardiac events at 30 days and 6 months (primary end point). Location of distal graft anastomosis was the left anterior descending artery in 19.6%, the left diagonal branch in 6.9%, the left marginal branch in 17.2%, the left posterolateral branch in 24.2%, the mid-segment of the right coronary artery in 28.7%, and the posterior descending artery in 3.4%. RESULTS:Baseline clinical demographics showed no relevant differences between both the groups. Mean age of vein grafts was 11.7+/- 4.3 years in group A versus 10.6+/- 4.9 years in group B (P=0.15). The number of stents per lesion was 1.4+/- 0.8 in group A versus 1.0+/- 0.8 in group B (P<0.01). The total length of stents was 32.2+/- 16.2 mm in group A versus 20.9+/-12.1 mm in group B (P<0.01). TIMI flow grade pre was 2.5+/-0.8 in group A versus 2.7+/- 0.6 in group B (P<0.05). TIMI flow grade post was 2.9+/- 0.3 versus 2.9+/- 0.2. Improvement of TIMI flow grade after SVG intervention was 0.4+/- 0.7 in group A versus 0.2+/- 0.6 in group B (P<0.05). Post-procedural CK-MB elevations were observed in 17 patients of group A versus 14 patients of group B (P=0.18). At 30 days, there were no myocardial infarctions (MIs) and no deaths in either group. One patient of group A had to be reoperated and four patients of group A underwent repeat PCI (4.6%) versus one patient of group B (1.2%). At 6 months, there were again no MIs and no deaths in either group. Target lesion revascularization rate was 17.3% in group A versus 11.5% in group B (P <0.02). CONCLUSION:When distal filter wire protection is used in high risk SVG lesions, the clinical outcome of percutaneous interventions may be equal to low risk SVG lesions without filter wire protection.