Retrospective comparison of emergency department length of stay for procedural sedation and analgesia by nurse practitioners and physicians.

PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE(2007)

引用 15|浏览10
暂无评分
摘要
Objectives: To determine if use of nurse practitioners (NPs) for procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) compared with physicians (MDs) decreased overall length of stay (LOS) in the pediatric emergency department (PED). Methods: Retrospective chart review was conducted on all children (age <21 years) undergoing procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) for 36 consecutive months at a tertiary academic children's hospital (n = 690). Data included times values for triage, evaluation by practitioner (NP, MD), sedation, discharge, and total LOS in the PED. Data collected also included medications given, patient diagnosis, and severe air-way complications. Results: Results revealed statistically significant time-related advantages to NP-managed sedations. Both PED LOS and time to sedation were significantly lower for NPs versus MDs across diagnoses (P < 0.01). The diagnoses managed by MDs versus NPs were significantly different for 3 diagnoses: fracture, finger, and lacerations. There were no differences between NP and MD for severe airway complication rates. Conclusions: Overall LOS and time to sedation were significantly improved when NPs independently managed patients requiring PSA without an increase in documented severe airway complication rates.
更多
查看译文
关键词
nurse practitioner,procedural sedation
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要