WeChat Mini Program
Old Version Features

THE OPTIMAL DURATION OF Ph-Monitoring: TESTING THE VALIDITY OF LYON 2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR WIRELESS Ph MEASUREMENT

GASTROENTEROLOGY(2024)

Cited 0|Views1
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The Lyon 2.0 consensus recommends 96-hr wireless pH studies for GERD diagnosis; however, the optimal length of pH-measurement has not been established. Further it is uncertain if, and under what circumstances, shorter recording times are sufficient for a conclusive diagnosis. METHODS Data from 944 patients with 4-day recordings was reviewed. Patients were classified at 24, 48, and 72-hrs against the 96-hr reference standard. Acid exposure time (AET) <4% was conclusively negative and AET >6% conclusively positive for GERD. Esophagitis was an independent marker of disease. The effect of utilizing average day, worst-day, and dominant-pattern analysis (≥2 negative or positive days) was compared. Groups defined by AET thresholds from 1% to 7% at 24- and 48-hr were followed to assess when short recording periods were sufficient for conclusive diagnosis. RESULTS Diagnostic accuracy improved with study duration (p < 0.00001). The proportion of patients with inconclusive results (AET 4-6%) reduced from 113/944 at 24-hr to 40/113 at 96-hr (35% of subgroup; p = 0.02), with similar results for dominant pattern analysis. Diagnostic sensitivity for 24, 48 and 72-hr pH-monitoring for AET 6% threshold increased with study duration from 62.5% to 76.6% and 88.2%, respectively, when compared to the 96-hour reference standard. CONCLUSION The results of this analysis validate the recommendation that prolonged reflux studies of at least 72-hr duration provide optimal AET measurements for GERD diagnosis. Prolonging studies can also resolve inconclusive results based on 24- and 48-hr studies.
More
Translated text
Key words
esophagitis,pH-monitoring,proton pump inhibitors
上传PDF
Bibtex
收藏
AI Read Science
AI Summary
AI Summary is the key point extracted automatically understanding the full text of the paper, including the background, methods, results, conclusions, icons and other key content, so that you can get the outline of the paper at a glance.
Example
Background
Key content
Introduction
Methods
Results
Related work
Fund
Key content
  • Pretraining has recently greatly promoted the development of natural language processing (NLP)
  • We show that M6 outperforms the baselines in multimodal downstream tasks, and the large M6 with 10 parameters can reach a better performance
  • We propose a method called M6 that is able to process information of multiple modalities and perform both single-modal and cross-modal understanding and generation
  • The model is scaled to large model with 10 billion parameters with sophisticated deployment, and the 10 -parameter M6-large is the largest pretrained model in Chinese
  • Experimental results show that our proposed M6 outperforms the baseline in a number of downstream tasks concerning both single modality and multiple modalities We will continue the pretraining of extremely large models by increasing data to explore the limit of its performance
Upload PDF to Generate Summary
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
Chat Paper

要点】:本研究验证了Lyon 2.0共识中推荐的至少72小时的无线pH监测对于胃食管反流病(GERD)诊断的最优性,并探讨了缩短监测时间在特定条件下的充分性。

方法】:通过分析944名患者为期4天的pH监测数据,对比了24、48、72小时与96小时监测结果的差异性,评估了不同时长监测对GERD诊断的准确性。

实验】:使用4天连续pH监测数据,以96小时为标准,对24、48、72小时的数据进行分类评估,通过酸暴露时间(AET)阈值分析,确定不同时长监测的诊断准确性,实验数据来源于具体的数据集但未明确提及数据集名称,结果显示随着监测时间延长,诊断准确性提高,并能减少不确定结果的比例。