WeChat Mini Program
Old Version Features

Towards the Lowest Efficacious Dose: Results from a Multicenter Noninferiority Randomized Open-Label Controlled Trial Assessing Tocilizumab or Abatacept Injection Spacing in Rheumatoid Arthritis in Remission

ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY(2024)

Sorbonne Université

Cited 2|Views47
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:We assess the clinical and structural impact at two years of progressively spacing tocilizumab (TCZ) or abatacept (ABA) injections versus maintenance at full dose in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in sustained remission.METHODS:This multicenter open-label noninferiority (NI) randomized clinical trial included patients with established rheumatoid arthritis in sustained remission receiving ABA or TCZ at a stable dose. Patients were randomized to treatment maintenance (M) at full dose (M-arm) or progressive injection spacing (S) driven by the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints every 3 months up to biologics discontinuation (S-arm). The primary end point was the evolution of disease activity according to the Disease Activity Score in 44 joints during the 2-year follow-up analyzed per protocol with a linear mixed-effects model, evaluated by an NI test based on the one-sided 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the slope difference (NI margin 0.25). Other end points were flare incidence and structural damage progression.RESULTS:Overall, 202 of the 233 patients included were considered for per protocol analysis (90 in S-arm and 112 in M-arm). At the end of follow-up, 16.2% of the patients in the S-arm could discontinue their biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, 46.9% tapered the dose and 36.9% returned to a full dose. NI was not demonstrated for the primary outcome, with a slope difference of 0.10 (95% CI 0.10-0.31) between the two arms. NI was not demonstrated for flare incidence (difference 42.6%, 95% CI 30.0-55.1) or rate of structural damage progression at two years (difference 13.9%, 95% CI -6.7 to 34.4).CONCLUSION:The Towards the Lowest Efficacious Dose trial failed to demonstrate NI for the proposed ABA or TCZ tapering strategy.
More
Translated text
Key words
Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs
PDF
Bibtex
收藏
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
Chat Paper

要点】:该研究通过多中心非劣效性随机开放标签对照试验,评估了在持续缓解期的类风湿性关节炎患者中,逐步增加 tocilizumab 或 abatacept 注射间隔的临床和结构性影响,结果显示提出的减量策略未达到非劣效性标准。

方法】:研究采用多中心开放标签非劣效性随机临床试验设计,将接受稳定剂量的 ABA 或 TCZ 治疗的患者随机分配到全剂量维持组(M组)或逐步注射间隔组(S组),通过疾病活动度评分每3个月调整治疗,直至生物制剂停用。

实验】:共233名患者纳入研究,其中202名按协议分析(S组90名,M组112名)。在随访结束时,S组中有16.2%的患者能够停止使用生物DMARD,46.9%减少剂量,36.9%恢复全剂量。主要结局未显示非劣效性,两组间的斜率差异为0.10(95% CI 0.10-0.31)。对于flare发生率和两年内结构性损伤进展速率,也未显示非劣效性。数据集名称未在文本中提及。