WeChat Mini Program
Old Version Features

[Application of Deep Learning Algorithm in the Grading Assessment of Corneal Fluorescein Staining].

Sichuan da xue xue bao Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University Medical science edition(2023)

四川大学华西临床医学院

Cited 0|Views24
Abstract
Objective:To explore the application value of applying deep learning (DL) algorithm in the grading assessment of corneal fluorescein staining.Methods:A cross-sectional study was carried out, covering 600 corneal fluorescein staining photos acquired in the Contact Lens Clinic, West China Hospital, Sichuan University between 2020 and 2022. Out of the 600 photos, 500 were used to construct the algorithm and the remaining 100 were used for the validation of the algorithm and a comparative analysis of the difference in grading accuracy (ACC) and the length of diagnostic time between artificial intelligence (AI) and optometry students. One month after finishing the first grading analysis, assessment by AI and optometry students was conducted for a second time and results from the two rounds of assessment were compared to examine the intrarater agreement ( kappa value) of the two analyses. The grading analysis results of 3 experienced optometrists were used as the gold standard in the study.Results:Findings of the cross validation with the complete dataset, the training dataset, and the test dataset showed that ResNet34 had the highest predictive accuracy among four DL models. ResNet34 DL model achieved an accuracy of 93.0%, sensitivity of 89.5%, and specificity of 89.6% in the grading of corneal staining. In the comparison of the grading accuracy of AI and two optometry students, AI showed better accuracy, with the respective grading accuracy being 87.0%, 78.0%, and 52.0% for AI, student 1, and student 2 ( P ACC=0.001). In addition, the average diagnostic time of AI was shorter than that of optometry students ( t AI=1.00 s, t S1=11.86 s, t S2=13.25 s, P t =0.001). In the comparative analysis of the intrarater agreement between the two assessments, AI ( kappa AI=0.658, P AI=0.001) achieved better consistency than the two optometry students did ( kappa S1=0.575, P S1=0.001; kappa S2=0.609, P S2=0.001).Conclusion:Applying deep learning algorithms in the grading assessment of corneal fluorescein staining has considerable feasibility and clinical value. In the performance comparison between AI and optometry students, AI achieved higher accuracy and better consistency, which indicates that AI has potential application value for assisting optometrists to make clinical decisions with speed and accuracy.
More
Translated text
Key words
Artificial intelligence,Contact lens,Corneal staining
求助PDF
上传PDF
Bibtex
AI Read Science
AI Summary
AI Summary is the key point extracted automatically understanding the full text of the paper, including the background, methods, results, conclusions, icons and other key content, so that you can get the outline of the paper at a glance.
Example
Background
Key content
Introduction
Methods
Results
Related work
Fund
Key content
  • Pretraining has recently greatly promoted the development of natural language processing (NLP)
  • We show that M6 outperforms the baselines in multimodal downstream tasks, and the large M6 with 10 parameters can reach a better performance
  • We propose a method called M6 that is able to process information of multiple modalities and perform both single-modal and cross-modal understanding and generation
  • The model is scaled to large model with 10 billion parameters with sophisticated deployment, and the 10 -parameter M6-large is the largest pretrained model in Chinese
  • Experimental results show that our proposed M6 outperforms the baseline in a number of downstream tasks concerning both single modality and multiple modalities We will continue the pretraining of extremely large models by increasing data to explore the limit of its performance
Upload PDF to Generate Summary
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined