A novel method accounting for predictor uncertainty and model transferability of invasive species distribution models

Predicting novel ranges of non-native species is a critical component to understanding the biosecurity threat posed by pests and diseases on economic, environmental and social assets. Species distribution models (SDMs) are often employed to predict the potential ranges of exotic pests and diseases in novel environments and geographic space. To date, researchers have focused on model complexity, data available for model fitting, the size of the geographic area to be considered and how the choice of model impacts results. These investigations are coupled with considerable examination of how model evaluation methods and test scores are influenced by these choices. An area that remains under-discussed is how to account for uncertainty in predictor selection while also selecting variables that increase a model's ability to predict to novel environments (model transferability). Here we propose a novel method to finesse this problem by using multiple simple (bivariate) models to search for the candidate sets of predictor variables that are likely to produce transferable models. Once identified, each set is then used to construct 2-dimehttps://www.overleaf.com/project/5d26cf1150cfdf6444b93c52nsional niche envelopes of pest presence/absence. This process ultimately results in a number of possible models that can be used to predict pest potential distributions, however, rather than relying on a single model, we ensemble these models in an attempt to account for predictor uncertainty. We apply this method to both virtual species and real species data, and find that it generally performs well against conventional approaches for statistically fitting numerous variables in a single model. While our methods only consider simple ecological relationships of species to environmental predictors, they allow for increased model transferability because they reduce the likelihood of over-fitting and collinearity issues. Simple models are also likely to be more conservative (over-predict potential distributions) relative to complex models containing many covariates -- making them more appropriate for risk-averse applications such as biosecurity. The approach we have explored transforms a model selection problem, for which there is no true correct answer amongst the typically distal covariates on offer, to one of model uncertainty. We argue that increased model transferability at the expense of model interpretation is perhaps more important for effective rapid predictions and management of non-native species and biological invasions. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.