Performance of repeat cytology with reflex ThyroSeq genomic classifier for indeterminant thyroid cytology

Background The American Thyroid Association recommends either repeat fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) or molecular testing (eg, ThyroSeq) of Bethesda category III (atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance [AUS/FLUS]) nodules to provide further risk stratification. How a testing algorithm that uses ancillary molecular tests performs as a reflex test for repeat sampling of indeterminant nodules remains unclear. Methods Thyroid FNABs performed over a 24-month period that received a diagnosis of AUS/FLUS and underwent subsequent FNAB were analyzed. Results In total, 187 patients were identified who received an FNAB diagnosis of AUS/FLUS and had repeat sampling. Of these patients, 64% received a subsequent indeterminant diagnosis on repeat biopsy: 7 (3.7%) repeat biopsies were diagnosed as nondiagnostic/unsatisfactory, 104 (55.6%) were diagnosed as AUS/FLUS, and 8 (4.3%) were diagnosed as follicular neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm. Of the repeat biopsied nodules, 63% underwent subsequent testing with ThyroSeq version 3. The diagnostic performance was calculated using only surgically confirmed nodules (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 30%; positive predictive value, 41%; negative predictive value, 100%) and by assigning nonresected nodules with negative ThyroSeq or benign cytology results as benign (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 88%; positive predictive value, 41%; negative predictive value, 100%). Conclusions In the majority of patients, repeat FNAB for AUS/FLUS did not preclude subsequent molecular ancillary testing because of the high rate of indeterminant results on repeat biopsy. The diagnostic performance of the testing algorithm reported here was very similar to other reports using either repeat biopsy or molecular testing alone. Ultimately, the algorithm of performing molecular testing on repeat indeterminant nodules increased the number of biopsies performed and lengthened the time to definitive risk stratification without a disproportionate decrease in the use of molecular testing or an appreciable improvement in diagnostic performance.