Clinical and radiological outcomes with an augmented baseplate for superior glenoid wear in reverse shoulder arthroplasty A PROPENSITY SCORE- MATCHED COMPARATIVE STUDY

Aims This study aimed to assess the impact of using the metal- augmented glenoid baseplate (AGB) on improving clinical and radiological outcomes, as well as reducing complications, in patients with superior glenoid wear undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Methods From January 2016 to June 2021, out of 235 patients who underwent primary RSA, 24 received a superior- AGB after off - axis reaming (Group A). Subsequently, we conducted propensity score matching in a 1:3 ratio, considering sex, age, follow - up duration, and glenoid wear (superior- inclination and retroversion), and selected 72 well- balanced matched patients who received a standard glenoid baseplate (STB) after eccentric reaming (Group B). Superior- inclination, retroversion, and lateral humeral offset (LHO) were measured to assess preoperative glenoid wear and postoperative correction, as well as to identify any complications. Clinical outcomes were measured at each outpatient visit before and after surgery. Results There were no significant differences in demographic data and preoperative characteris- tics between the two groups. Both groups showed significant improvements in patientreported outcome measures (visual analogue scale for pain, visual analogue scale for function, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Constant, and Simple Shoulder Test scores) from preoperative to final assessment (p < 0.001). However, AGB showed no additional benefit. Notably, within range of motion, Group B showed significant postop- erative decrease in both external rotation and internal rotation, unlike Group A (p = 0.028 and 0.003, respectively). Both groups demonstrated a significant correction of superiorinclination after surgery, while patients in Group B exhibited a significant decrease in LHO postoperatively (p = 0.001). Regarding complications, Group A experienced more acromial stress fractures (3 cases; 12.5%), whereas Group B had a higher occurrence of scapular notching (24 cases; 33.3%) (p = 0.008). Conclusion Both eccentric reaming with STB and off - axis reaming with AGB are effective methods for addressing superior glenoid wear in RSA, leading to improved clinical outcomes. However, it is important to be aware of the potential risks associated with eccentric reaming, which include excessive bone loss leading to reduced rotation and scapular notching.