Causality between Diabetes and MN: Mendelian randomization and meta-analysis

Background: Membranous nephropathy (MN) has not yet been fully elucidated regarding its relationship with Type I and II Diabetes. This study aims to evaluate the causal effect of multiple types of diabetes and MN by summarizing the evidence from the Mendelian randomization (MR) study. Methods: The statistical data for MN was obtained from a GWAS study encompassing 7,979 individuals. Regarding diabetes, fasting glucose, fasting insulin, and HbA1C data, we accessed the UK-Biobank, within family GWAS consortium, MAGIC, Finnish database, MRC-IEU, and Neale Lab, which provided sample sizes ranging from 17,724 to 298,957. As a primary method in this MR analysis, we employed the Inverse Variance Weighted (IVW), Weighted Median, Weighted mode, MR-Egger, Mendelian randomization pleiotropy residual sum, and outlier (MR-PRESSO) and Leave-one-out sensitivity test. Reverse MR analysis was utilized to investigate whether MN affects Diabetes. Meta-analysis was applied to combine study-specific estimates. Results： It has been determined that type 2 diabetes, gestational diabetes, type 1 diabetes with or without complications, maternal diabetes, and insulin use pose a risk to MN. Based on the genetic prediction, fasting insulin, fasting blood glucose, and HbA1c levels were not associated with the risk of MN. No heterogeneity, horizontal pleiotropy, or reverse causal relationships were found. The meta-analysis results further validated the accuracy. Conclusions: The MR analysis revealed the association between MN and various subtypes of diabetes. This study has provided a deeper understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms connecting MN and diabetes. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. ### Funding Statement Shenzhen Key Medical Discipline Construction Fund (SZXK009) and Shenzhen Sanming project (SZSM202211013) ### Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: All data were obtained from IEU Open GWAS Project. It's available for everyone. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors