The positive impact of conservation action.

Penny F Langhammer,Joseph W Bull,Jake E Bicknell, Joseph L Oakley, Mary H Brown, Michael W Bruford,Stuart H M Butchart,Jamie A Carr, Don Church,Rosie Cooney, Simone Cutajar,Wendy Foden, Matthew N Foster, Claude Gascon,Jonas Geldmann,Piero Genovesi,Michael Hoffmann, Jo Howard-McCombe, Tiffany Lewis,Nicholas B W Macfarlane, Zoe E Melvin, Rossana Stoltz Merizalde, Meredith G Morehouse,Shyama Pagad,Beth Polidoro,Wes Sechrest,Gernot Segelbacher, Kevin G Smith, Janna Steadman,Kyle Strongin, Jake Williams,Stephen Woodley,Thomas M Brooks

Science (New York, N.Y.)(2024)

引用 0|浏览1
暂无评分
摘要
Governments recently adopted new global targets to halt and reverse the loss of biodiversity. It is therefore crucial to understand the outcomes of conservation actions. We conducted a global meta-analysis of 186 studies (including 665 trials) that measured biodiversity over time and compared outcomes under conservation action with a suitable counterfactual of no action. We find that in two-thirds of cases, conservation either improved the state of biodiversity or at least slowed declines. Specifically, we find that interventions targeted at species and ecosystems, such as invasive species control, habitat loss reduction and restoration, protected areas, and sustainable management, are highly effective and have large effect sizes. This provides the strongest evidence to date that conservation actions are successful but require transformational scaling up to meet global targets.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要