Outcomes of acute ankle distraction for intra-articular distal tibial and pilon fractures

IntroductionIntra articular distal tibia fractures can lead to post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Joint distraction has shown promise in elective cases. However, its application in acute fractures remains unexplored. This pilot study aims to fill this knowledge gap by investigating the benefits of joint distraction in acute fractures.Materials & MethodsWe undertook a restrospective cohort study comprising patients with intra-articular distal tibia and pilon fractures treated with a circular ring fixator (CRF) at a single center. Prospective data collection included radiological assessments, Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROM), necessity for additional procedures, and Kellgren and Lawrence grade (KL) for osteoarthritis (OA).137 patients were included in the study, 30 in the distraction group and 107 in the non-distraction group. There was no significant difference between the groups.ResultsMean follow-up was 3.73 years. There was no significant difference between the groups in overall complications or need for further procedures. There was no significant difference in progression of KL between the groups (1.81 vs 2.0, p=0.38) mean follow up 1.90 years.PROM data was available for 44 patients (6 distraction, 38 non-distraction) with a mean follow-up of 1.71 years. There was no significant difference in EQ5D (p=0.32) and C Olerud-H Molander scores (p=0.17).ConclusionsThis pilot study suggests that joint distraction is safe in the acute setting. However, the study's impact is constrained by a relatively small patient cohort and a short-term follow-up period. Future investigations should prioritise longer-term follow-ups and involve a larger patient population to more comprehensively evaluate the potential benefits of joint distraction in acute fractures.