Case-finding for HPV vaccination eligibility within a dental office with concurrent development of a dialogue tool

Background Human papillomavirus (HPV) immunization can prevent cancers, but uptake has been incomplete (and worse with the COVID-19 pandemic). Dental clinicians already screen for oral cancers, many of which are caused by HPV, and could identify vaccination candidates, but this requires a case-finding strategy. Objective The purpose of this study was (1) to develop and test a case-finding approach to identify patients who were candidates for HPV vaccinations, (2) to test an HPV vaccination intervention by dental professionals on vaccination uptake. Methods Design: Prospective, non-randomized feasibility case finding study with a 4-week enrollment period and a 6 week follow up period in general dental offices.Setting: Two general and non-commercial dentistry offices in Edmonton, Alberta Canada.Subjects: Consecutive scheduled (non-emergent) patients who met the Health Canada criteria for HPV vaccination: immunocompetent males and females aged 9–45 years and those who are immunocompromised. Consent for the discussion was obtained from each subject or parent.Intervention: Scheduled dental patients meeting the inclusion criteria were flagged by a research assistant who reviewed the appointment schedule each week for 4 weeks. For these subjects, dental clinicians (dentists and dental hygienists) used our Dental Dialogue Tool to discuss HPV vaccination and answer questions. Participating patients who consented to receive the HPV vaccine were given a prescription by the attending dentist and were directed to follow-up with a local pharmacy to have the vaccine administered. Each participant that was provided with an HPV prescription was contacted after 6 weeks to identify if they received the first dose of vaccine.Outcomes: Yield of our case-finding strategy and receipt of a patient’s first HPV vaccine dose during 6 weeks post vaccine prescription. Results Our case-finding strategy assessed 656 scheduled patients over 4 weeks. From this screening,179 (a case-finding yield of 20.4 %), were candidates for HPV vaccine discussion. Forty-three of these 179 patients (24 %) were already vaccinated.. Two patients (1.1 %) did not consent to be spoken with and 134 (74.8 %) consented to the HPV vaccine discussion.. Forty-eight of 134 patients (35.8 %) of patients accepted a prescription from the dentist after speaking with the dental clinician. Ultimately, 8/48 (16 %) (patients received their first dose of the HPV vaccine by the 6 week of follow-up call. However, this is only 4.5 % (8/177) of those patients who did consent for the discussion of HPV cancers and vaccination from their dentist. Conclusion We demonstrated that case-finding for HPV vaccine candidates in general dental offices was feasible, with a reasonable yield. While the dental dialogue tool was described as a great resource to explain the facts and answer questions, very few patients were vaccinated after 6 weeks of follow-up. Further work is necessary to sharpen the intervention, perhaps including follow-up discussions with the dental clinicians.