Simplified test method for evaluating progressive collapse resistance of precast concrete frame structures

To evaluate the progressive collapse resistance of precast concrete (PC) structures, various test methods have been used in existing experimental studies. However, verification of whether the progressive collapse resistance can be evaluated equivalently by different test methods has been limitedly investigated. In this study, three simplified and three half-frame test specimens were tested under monotonic vertical loading to investigate the effects of the test method on their progressive collapse resistance. As the test parameters, types of test specimens (i.e., sub-frame, simplified, and half-frame specimens), and joint details (i.e., reinforced concrete (RC) continuous joint, PC with continuous joint, and PC with pinned joint) were directly compared. The test results showed that the progressive collapse resistance was primarily affected by the overall lateral stiffness of the exterior columns (Kh) rather than the test setup. When Kh increased in the simplified specimens, the axial force transferred by the beams increased, resulting in an increase in the peak strength (PCAA). Further, the effect of Kh on the peak strength was greater in PC specimens with pinned joints than in RC and PC specimens with continuous joints. To investigate the effect of Kh on the PCAA, a parametric study was conducted using the existing CAA strength model. The parametric study results also indicated that the relationship between the increase in Kh and PCAA was not significantly governed by the test setup for the same joint details. These results indicated that various simplified test methods can be used to evaluate the progressive collapse resistance of PC structures when an adequate range of Kh is provided. Based on the test and parametric study results, recommendations for progressive collapse tests were discussed.