Overdot and overline annotation must be understood to accurately interpret (SIC)O2MAX physiology with the Fick formula

FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY(2024)

引用 0|浏览1
暂无评分
摘要
Few formulas have been used in exercise physiology as extensively as the Fick formula, which calculates the rate of oxygen consumption (i.e., (SIC)O-2) as the product of cardiac output (Q.) and the difference in oxygen content in arterial and mixed venous blood (Delta avO(2)). Unfortunately, the physiology of maximum (SIC)O-2 ((SIC)O-2MAX) is often misinterpreted due to a lack of appreciation for the limitations represented by the oft-ignored superscript annotations in the Fick formula. The purpose of this perspective is to explain the meaning of the superscript annotations and highlight how such annotations influence proper interpretation of (SIC)O-2MAX physiology with the Fick formula. First, we explain the significance of the overdots above (SIC)O-2 and (SIC), which indicate a measure per unit of time. As we will show, the presence of an overdot above Q. and lack of one above Delta avO(2) denotes they are different types of ratios and should be interpreted in the context of one another-not in contrast to each other as is commonplace. Second, we discuss the significance of the overline above the "v" in Delta avO(2), which indicates the venous sample is an average of blood that comes from mixed sources. The mixed nature of the venous sample has major implications for interpreting the influence of oxygen diffusion and blood flow heterogeneity on Delta avO(2). Ultimately, we give recommendations and insights for using the Fick formula to calculate (SIC)O-2 and interpret (SIC)O-2MAX physiology.
更多
查看译文
关键词
V.O-2MAX,cardiac output,arteriovenous oxygen difference,endurance training,muscle oxygen diffusion
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要