IPACK Block Efficacy for Acute Pain Management after Total Knee Replacement: A Review

William C. Upshaw, John M. Richey, Joseph P. Tassin, Mark V. Frolov, Benjamin C. Miller, Aaron J. Kaye, Jeffrey Sterritt,Charles J. Fox, Shahab Ahmadzadeh,Sahar Shekoohi,Alan D. Kaye

Current Pain and Headache Reports(2024)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
Patients often experience a significant degree of knee pain following total knee replacement (TKR). To alleviate this pain, nerve blocks may be performed such as the adductor canal block (ACB). However, ACBs are unable to relieve pain originating from the posterior region of the knee. A new type of nerve block known as the IPACK block may be used in conjunction with ACBs as it is designed to inhibit nerve branches innervating this area. In this article, we examine the rationale behind the IPACK procedure, how it is performed, and clinical trials examining its efficacy. 5 of the 7 clinical trials examined in this article showed the IPACK + ACB block to show superior efficacy in treating pain following TKR compared to other blocks. These blocks included PMDI+ACB, SPANK+ACB, PAI+ACB, ACB alone, and SCAB. 2 of the 7 clinical trials showed the IPACK + ACB to be less effective in managing patients pain following TKR compared to other blocks which included the CACB and 4 in 1 block. In most instances, the IPACK + ACB showed superior efficacy in managing patients’ pain following TKR when compared to other types of nerve blocks. This was determined by measuring usage of opioids, reported postoperative pain, and length of hospital stays following TKR. Thus, we suppose the IPACK block may be used in conjunction with the ACB to effectively reduce patient’s pain following TKR.
更多
查看译文
关键词
IPACK block,Peripheral nerve block,Total knee replacement,Postoperative pain,Analgesic treatment
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要