Fast dual-echo estimation of apparent long T2 fraction using ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imaging in tibialis tendons and its osteoporosis-related differences in women.

Background:Tendon and bone comprise a critical interrelating unit. Bone loss, including that seen with osteopenia (OPe) or osteoporosis (OPo), may be associated with a reduction in tendon quality, though this remains incompletely investigated. Clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences cannot directly detect signals from tendons because of the very short T2. Clinical MRI may detect high-graded abnormalities by changes in the adjacent structures like bone. However, ultrashort echo time MRI (UTE-MRI) can capture high signals from all tendons. To determine if the long T2 fraction, as measured by a dual-echo UTE-MRI sequence, is a sensitive quantitative technique to the age- and bone-loss-related changes of the lower leg tendons. Methods:This is a cross-sectional study conducted between January 2018 to February 2020 in the lower legs of 14 female patients with OPe [72±6 years old, body mass index (BMI) =25.8±6.2 kg/m2] and 31 female patients with OPo (73±6 years old, BMI=22.0±3.8 kg/m2), as well as 30 female subjects with normal bone (Normal, 35±18 years old, BMI =23.2±4.3 kg/m2), were imaged on a 3T clinical scanner using a dual-echo 3D Cones UTE sequence. We defined the apparent long T2 signal fraction (aFrac-LongT2) of tendons as the ratio between the signal at the second echo time (TE =2.2 ms) to the UTE signal. The average aFrac-LongT2 and the cross-sectional area were calculated for the anterior tibialis tendons (ATTs) and the posterior tibialis tendons (PTTs). The Kruskal-Wallis rank test was used to compare the differences in aFrac-LongT2 and the cross-sectional area of the tendons between the groups. Results:The aFrac-LongT2 of the ATTs and PTTs were significantly higher in the OPo group compared with the Normal group (22.2% and 34.8% in the ATT and PTT, respectively, P<0.01). The cross-sectional area in the ATTs was significantly higher for the OPo group than in the Normal group (Normal/OPo difference was 28.7, P<0.01). Such a difference for PTTs did not reach the significance level. Mean aFrac-LongT2 and cross-sectional area in the OPe group were higher than the Normal group and lower than the OPo group. However, the differences did not show statistical significance, likely due to the higher BMI in the OPe group. Conclusions:Dual-echo UTE-MRI is a rapid quantification technique, and aFrac-LongT2 values showed significant differences in tendons between Normal and OPo patients.