The EORTC QLU-C10D is a valid cancer-specific preference-based measure for cost-utility and health technology assessment in the Netherlands

Micha J. Pilz, Simon Seyringer, Lára R. Hallsson,Andrew Bottomley, Femke Jansen,Madeleine T. King, Richard Norman, Marianne J. Rutten, Irma M. Verdonck-de Leeuw, Peter D. Siersema,Eva Maria Gamper

The European Journal of Health Economics(2024)

引用 0|浏览2
暂无评分
摘要
Cost-utility analysis typically relies on preference-based measures (PBMs). While generic PBMs are widely used, disease-specific PBMs can capture aspects relevant for certain patient populations. Here the EORTC QLU-C10D, a cancer-specific PBM based on the QLQ-C30, is validated using Dutch trial data with the EQ-5D-3L as a generic comparator measure. We retrospectively analysed data from four Dutch randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comprising the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EQ-5D-3L. Respective Dutch value sets were applied. Correlations between the instruments were calculated for domains and index scores. Bland–Altman plots and intra-class correlations (ICC) displayed agreement between the measures. Independent and paired t-tests, effect sizes and relative validity indices were used to determine the instruments’ performance in detecting clinically known-group differences and health changes over time. We analysed data from 602 cancer patients from four different trials. In overall, the EORTC QLU-C10D showed good relative validity with the EQ-5D-3L as a comparator (correlations of index scores r = 0.53–0.75, ICCs 0.686–0.808, conceptually similar domains showed higher correlations than dissimilar domains). Most importantly, it detected 63
更多
查看译文
关键词
Cancer-specific preference-based measure,EORTC QLU-C10D,EQ-5D-3L,Validity,Responsiveness,I180
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要