Redrawing early human dispersal patterns with cosmogenic nuclides 

Burial dating with two cosmogenic nuclides (e.g. 26Al and 10Be) is unveiling the last 5 million years of the sedimentary record. There is no dating method of comparable reliability for the fragmentary records typical of terrestrial settings. For the first time, we can explore events on the same timescale as mountain-building, we can reconstruct landscapes that predate the initiation of the northern hemisphere glaciations, and we can explore milestones in the evolution of our species. Here we focus on illustrating the latter: two field sites in which 10Be-26Al burial dating has reshaped our understanding of early human dispersal in Eurasia. Both are well known Palaeolithic sites hosting Mode-1-type stone tools that despite being intensively studied have not been dated conclusively by other methods. At Korolevo on the Tysa River in western Ukraine, alluvium containing stone tools is dated to 1.42 ± 0.10 Ma using the burial dating model, P-PINI (Particle-Pathway Inversion of Nuclide Inventories). Korolevo stands as the earliest securely dated hominin presence in Europe and bridges the spatial and temporal gap between the Caucasus (~1.85–1.78 Ma) and southwestern Europe (~1.2–1.1 Ma). Our findings advance the hypothesis of colonisation of Europe from the east well before the Middle Pleistocene Transition. At Diring Yuriakh on the Lena River in eastern Siberia, stone tools are buried by aeolian sand sheets. We combine optically stimulated luminescence dating with the P-PINI burial dating model to yield an age of 417 ± 82 ka, which is at least 300 kyr earlier than the previously documented earliest human presence north of 60 degrees. This timing overlaps with exceptional warmth across the High North during the ‘super-interglacial’ MIS 11c (426–396 ka), suggesting that warm climate intervals permitted human migration well beyond widely accepted territorial bounds. Reflecting on these advances, we evaluate the pros and cons of burial dating relative to other widely used dating approaches in archaeology and palaeoanthropology.