Resource Utilization Analysis of Two Mobilization Regimens for Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant in Multiple Myeloma

Background Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a standard of care therapy for multiple myeloma (MM). A key step in this procedure is the mobilization and collection of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC). HPC mobilization typically uses G-CSF with or without Plerixafor (P). Although P increases the effectiveness of mobilization and may reduce the number of apheresis sessions, it is associated with significantly increased cost per dose. There is significant heterogeneity to HPC collection algorithms across institutions with no clear standard. At the Cleveland Clinic, our HPC collection algorithm was updated in an effort to reduce the use and associated cost of P. The criteria for initiating P became more stringent and far fewer patients were initiated on P prior to their first session of HPC collection apheresis. Prior to October 2017, patients were initiated on P if any 1 of the following criteria were met: age>60 years, prior treatment with alkylating therapy, prior treatment with lenalidomide >2 cycles, or platelet count <100K. Starting October 1, 2017, patients were initiated on P prior to first collection only if all 3 of the following criteria were met: age > 65 years, lenalidomide > 6 cycles, and platelet count < 100K. However, P was added after the first apheresis session if peripheral blood CD34+ cell count was <20/uL or HPC yield was unsatisfactory (<2 × 10^6 CD34+ cells). Herein, we perform a comparative resource utilization analysis of HPC collection at our center. Methods We retrospectively collected HPC mobilization data on patients undergoing HCT for MM from 1/12014 to 12/31/2020. We determined the number of P doses, number of apheresis sessions, and HPC collection totals per patient. Patient characteristics were summarized in median, interquartile range (IQR), or frequencies and percentages as appropriate. Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to compare variables in patients prior to versus after 10/1/2017. Results As anticipated, the protocol change drastically decreased the number of patients receiving P prior to their first apheresis session. The number of doses of P per patient decreased after the change (pre-change median dose / patient = 1, IQR = 1-2) (post-change median dose / patient = 1, IQR = 0-2) (p=0.004). The average number of apheresis sessions required per patient increased following the change (pre-change median apheresis sessions = 1, IQR = 1-2) (median post change apheresis sessions = 2, IQR = 2-3) (p<0.0001) (Figure 1). Conclusion Changes to our institutional HPC mobilization algorithm led to a substantial decrease in the use of preemptive P prior to day 1 of collection by design. The resulting decrease in total doses of P per patient was smaller than expected, although still statistically significant. However, this was offset by a concomitant significant increase in the number of apheresis sessions required per patient.