Intercomparison of leaf area index observed by destructive sampling, plant canopy analyzer and tracing radiation and architecture of canopies in paddy fields

Leaf area index (LAI) is a canopy structure parameter used to characterize vegetation growth. It is increasingly important to obtain continuous and accurate ground LAI measurement data for the validation of remote-sensing products. In this study, direct destructive sampling method and indirect optical measurement including LAI-2200 plant canopy analyser (PCA) and Tracing Radiation and Architecture of Canopies (TRAC) were used for long-term continuous observation of paddy fields in southern China, to explore the variation of LAI during the growth period of paddy, and to quantitatively analyse the errors of indirect optical measurement. The results show that (1) LAI and Plant area index (PAI) increased first and then decreased in the growing period. The proportion of green leaf area gradually decreased at reproductive growth stage (less than 50%). There was a linear relationship between the proportion of green leaf area and PAI at this stage, with a good correlation (R2 = 0.73). This linear relationship can be used to convert PAI into LAI more conveniently. (2) Effective PAI (PAIe) calculated by the two methods (2000 method and Lang method) from PCA showed good consistency between each other in the growing season (the maximum value of R2 is 0.99). With the increase of zenith angle, the consistency between 2000 method and Lang method decreases (R2 = 0.83). Multiple scattering has an effect on PCA measurement, and this effect is more obvious at high zenith angle. Lang method is more sensitive to the change of zenith angle. (3) Compared to the destructive values, both 2000 method and Lang method are able to compute accurate LAI using four ring sensors (4 R), while TRAC underestimates the LAI and PAI from destructive sampling method. This study provided a new idea for reducing the impact of ground reference data errors on LAI product validation.