A Comparison of Methods for Specifying Optimal Random Effects Structures

METHODOLOGY-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH METHODS FOR THE BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES(2023)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
Using Monte Carlo simulations, this study compared the performance of various approaches to the specification of random effects structures in linear mixed effects models (LMMs), including the minimal approach, the maximal approach, the forward search, the backward search, and the allpossible structures approach. The results showed that if the predictor of interest is at the withincluster level or involves a cross-level interaction, the maximal approach, the best-path forward search, and the best-path backward search are all desirable methods. If the predictor of interest is at the cluster level, it is not essential to specify random slopes of Level-1 predictors. In addition, it is important to specify random slopes of within-cluster control variables, as they can increase the statistical power for testing the main within-cluster variables, especially when the sample size is small and the variance of the random slope of the control variable is large.
更多
查看译文
关键词
linear mixed effects models (LMMs),random effects structures,model specification,model selection,mathematics subject
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要