Potential underreporting of treated patients using a Clostridioides difficile testing algorithm that screens with a nucleic acid amplification test

Alice Y. Guh, Scott Fridkin,Dana Goodenough, Lisa G. Winston, Helen Johnston, Elizabeth Basiliere,Danyel Olson, Christopher D. Wilson, Jasmine J. Watkins, Lauren Korhonen,Dale N. Gerding

INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY(2024)

引用 0|浏览2
暂无评分
摘要
Objective: Patients tested for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) using a 2-step algorithm with a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) followed by toxin assay are not reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network as a laboratory-identified CDI event if they are NAAT positive (+)/toxin negative (-). We compared NAAT+/toxin- and NAAT+/toxin+ patients and identified factors associated with CDI treatment among NAAT+/toxin- patients. Design: Retrospective observational study. Setting: The study was conducted across 36 laboratories at 5 Emerging Infections Program sites. Patients: We defined a CDI case as a positive test detected by this 2-step algorithm during 2018-2020 in a patient aged >= 1 year with no positive test in the previous 8 weeks. Methods: We used multivariable logistic regression to compare CDI-related complications and recurrence between NAAT+/toxin- and NAAT+/toxin+ cases. We used a mixed-effects logistic model to identify factors associated with treatment in NAAT+/toxin- cases. Results: Of 1,801 cases, 1,252 were NAAT+/toxin-, and 549 were NAAT+/toxin+. CDI treatment was given to 866 (71.5%) of 1,212 NAAT+/toxin- cases versus 510 (95.9%) of 532 NAAT+/toxin+ cases (P < .0001). NAAT+/toxin- status was protective for recurrence (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.55-0.77) but not CDI-related complications (aOR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.87-1.28). Among NAAT+/toxin- cases, white blood cell count >= 15,000/L (aOR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.28-2.74), >= 3 unformed stools for >= 1 day (aOR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.40-2.59), and diagnosis by a laboratory that provided no or neutral interpretive comments (aOR, 3.23; 95% CI, 2.23-4.68) were predictors of CDI treatment. Conclusion: Use of this 2-step algorithm likely results in underreporting of some NAAT+/toxin- cases with clinically relevant CDI. Disease severity and laboratory interpretive comments influence treatment decisions for NAAT+/toxin- cases.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要