Comparison of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound and Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Assessment of Infant Hip Perfusion and Prediction of Proximal Femoral Growth Disturbance Following Closed and Open Reduction for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Preliminary Study.

OBJECTIVE:Proximal femoral growth disturbance (PFGD) is a significant complication associated with surgical treatment of infant hip dislocation. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI) has been utilized to assess perfusion in these hips and avoid PFGD. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is an imaging technique utilized to evaluate perfusion in other organs. The aims of this study were to compare perfusion of dysplastic infant hips with CEUS and CEMRI after surgical treatment and to determine whether CEUS was as effective as CEMRI at predicting PFGD. METHODS:A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing closed or open reduction for infant hip dislocation between 2012 and 2019 was performed. All patients underwent intraoperative CEUS and postoperative CEMRI to assess femoral epiphyseal perfusion using intravenous contrast. Perfusion status was rated as normal, partially decreased, or globally decreased in both modalities. Agreement in perfusion status between CEUS and CEMRI was assessed. Patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years postoperatively and assessed for PFGD. RESULTS:Eighteen patients (28% males) underwent closed or open reduction at an average age of 8 months (3 to 16 mo). The agreement in perfusion status between CEUS and CEMRI was substantial (α = 0.74). Patients were followed for a median of 3 years. PFGD developed in 3 hips (17%). For the detection of PFGD, both imaging modalities performed very well and with no difference in the diagnostic utility of CEUS compared with CEMRI. Considering normal perfusion alone the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for CEUS were 83%, 100%, and 80%, and for CEMRI were 78%, 100%, and 73%, respectively. Considering global decreased perfusion alone, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for CEUS were 94%, 67%, and 100%, and for CEMRI were 89%, 67%, and 93%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:CEUS is a viable intraoperative method to assess infant hip perfusion. This pilot study appears to be comparable to CEMRI at visualizing perfusion of infant hips and as good or better in predicting PFGD after hip reduction. Prospective studies of this imaging technique should be performed to confirm the findings of this retrospective review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Level II-development diagnostic criteria on the basis of consecutive patients (with generally preferred standard).