An Evaluation of Early Complications after Prepectoral Tissue Expander Placement in First-Stage Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix

Purpose: Prepectoral breast reconstruction has become popularized with the concurrent use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM). We sought to compare three-month postoperative complication rates and explantation rates for first stage, tissue expander based prepectoral breast reconstruction with and without the use of ADM. Methods: A single institution retrospective chart review was performed to identify consecutive patients undergoing prepectoral tissue-expander based breast reconstruction from August 2020 to January 2022. Chi-squared tests were used to compare demographic categorical variables and multiple variable regression models were used to identify variables associated with three-month postoperative outcomes. Results: We enrolled 124 consecutive patients. Fifty-five patients (98 breasts) were included in the no-ADM cohort and 69 patients (98 breasts) were included in the ADM cohort. There were no statistically significant differences between ADM and no-ADM cohort in regard to 90-day postoperative outcomes. On multivariable analysis, there were no independent associations between seroma, hematoma, wound dehiscence, mastectomy skin flap necrosis, infection, unplanned return to the OR, or explanation in the ADM or no ADM groups after controlling for age, BMI, history of diabetes, tobacco use, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and postoperative radiotherapy. Conclusion: Our results reveal no significant differences in odds of postoperative complications, unplanned return to the OR, or explantation between ADM and no-ADM cohorts. More studies are needed to evaluate the safety of prepectoral, tissue expander placement without ADM.