Effect of Feeding Ractopamine to Finisher Lard-Type Mangalica Pigs on Longissimus Muscle Fiber Myosin-Heavy Chain Isoform Expression and Cross-Sectional Area

Abstract Heritage breeds such as Mangalica pigs are gaining popularity in US niche markets and currently sold as high-quality meat due to greater meat quality characteristics. Research has demonstrated that feeding the β-adrenergic agonist ractopamine hydrochloride (RAC), stimulates hypertrophic growth of type-2, fast-twitch glycolytic muscle fibers via mTOR signaling resulting in greater myofibrillar protein synthesis. Therefore, the current study evaluated the effect of feeding RAC to Mangalica pigs during the finisher phase on longissimus muscle fiber myosin heavy-chain (MHC) isoform expression and cross-sectional area. Mangalica pigs were randomly assigned finisher diets for 21 d with 20 ppm (RAC; n = 8) or without (CTL; n = 6). Longissimus muscle samples were collected during carcass fabrication, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 °C. Immunofluorescence staining of 5-µm-thick cryosections to identify Type-1 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB) antibody Ba-D5), Type-2a (DSHB SC-71), and 2x (DSHB BF-35) MHC positive fibers. Type 2b fibers were determined by subtraction. Fibers in each image (≥ 150) were assessed for fiber type and their cross-sectional area (CSA) at 200X magnification. Data were analyzed as a one-way ANOVA using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS V9.4. Means were separated with the PDIFF option and declared different when P ≤ 0.05. Tendencies were declared when 0.0501 ≤ P ≤ 0.1000. Feeding RAC decreased the density of Type 2a (P = 0.0136) and Type 2b (P = 0.0186) fibers in the longissimus muscle of Mangalica pigs. A tendency for RAC to reduce the density of Type 1, slow-twitch (6.61 vs. 16.14 fiber per mm2; P = 0.0505) fibers and increase the density of primarily oxidative fibers expressing a combination of Type 1 + Type 2a MHC isoforms (10.23 vs. 2.88%; P = 0.0524) was also observed. When analyzed as a proportion of total fibers, RAC reduced the proportion of fibers expressing only Type 2a (11.8 vs. 6.70%; P = 0.0468) and Type 2b (0.19 vs. 1.32%; P = 0.0101) MHC isoforms but increased the percentage of fibers expressing both Type 1 + Type 2a MHC isoforms (4.66 vs. 1.13%; P = 0.0280). Feeding RAC did not impact the density or proportion of fibers expressing Type 2x MHC (P ≥ 0.386). Mean longissimus muscle fiber CSA was not impacted by feeding Mangalica pigs RAC for 21 d (P = 0.4815). The CSA of the smallest and largest fibers nor fiber distribution were influenced by RAC inclusion in the diet of Mangalica pigs (P ≥ 0.484). In conclusion, feeding RAC Mangalica pigs impacted fiber MHC isoform expression in the longissimus muscle without altering fiber CSA. Future studies will explore the impact of RAC on the CSA of the various fiber types as well as the impact on other muscles in the Mangalica pig.