The pedicle screw accuracy using a robotic system and measured by a novel 3-dimensional method

Marcelo Oppermann, Vahagan Karapetyan,Shaurya Gupta,Joel Ramjist, Priscila Oppermann,Victor XD Yang

Research Square (Research Square)(2023)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
Abstract Robotics in medicine is associated with precision, accuracy, and replicability. Several robotic systems are used in spine surgery. They are all considered shared-control systems, providing "steady-hand" manipulation instruments. Although numerous studies have testified to the benefits of robotic instrumentations, they must address their true accuracy. Our study used the Mazor system under several situations and compared the spatial accuracy of the pedicle screw (PS) insertion and its planned trajectory. We used two cadaveric specimens with intact spinal structures from C7 to S1. PS planning was performed using the two registration methods (preopCT/C-arm or CT-to-fluoroscopy registration). After planning, the implant spatial orientation was defined based on six anatomic parameters using axial and sagittal CT images. Two surgical open and percutaneous access were used to insert the PS. After that, another CT acquisition was taken. Accuracy was classified into optimal, inaccurate and unacceptable according to the degree of screw deviation from its planning using the same spatial orientation method. Based on the type of spatial deviation, we also classified the PS trajectory into 16 pattern errors. Seven (19%) out of 37 implanted screws were considered unacceptable (deviation distances >2.0 mm or angulation >5°), and 14 (38%) were inaccurate ( >0.5 mm and ≤ 2.0 mm or >2.5º and ≤ 5º). CT-to-fluoroscopy registration was superior to preopCT/C-arm (average deviation in 0.9mm vs. 1.7mm, respectively, p<0.003), and percutaneous was slightly better than open but did not reach significance (1.3mm vs. 1.7mm, respectively). Regarding pattern error, the tendency was to have more axial than sagittal shifts. Using a quantitative method to categorize the screw 3D position, only 10.8% of the screws were considered unacceptable. However, with a more rigorous concept of inaccuracy, almost half were non-optimal. We also identified that, unlike some previous results, the O-arm registration delivers more accurate implants than the preopCT/C-arm method.
更多
查看译文
关键词
pedicle screw accuracy,robotic system
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要