Financial Improvements from Short Course Adjuvant Vaginal Cuff Brachytherapy (VCB) in Early Endometrial Cancer Compared to Standard of Care, “SAVE” Trial

Early-stage endometrial cancer is often managed with hysterectomy followed by adjuvant VCB. Financial toxicity from cancer treatment is a strong driver of adherence. The SAVE trial is a multicenter, prospective randomized trial of standard of care (SoC) VCB doses delivered in 3-5 fractions per physician discretion compared to a 2-fraction course. We report on secondary cost endpoints, quantifying the financial impacts of shorter treatment courses on institutions and participating patients.Technical (TechCs), professional (PCs), and total charges (TotCs) were collected prospectively and are reported as raw and Medicare-adjusted charges per patient. Geographic variations were standardized with CMS Geographic Practice Cost Indices (GPCI), and inflation was adjusted using the Consumer Price Index (CPI): Medical Care. Distance to treatment center was calculated from the patient's zip code to the corresponding treatment center. Cost of commutes was estimated through round-trip travel distance multiplied by average gas MPG for new vehicles by treatment year and state. Median income for each patient's zip code was estimated using 5-year Household income in 2021 inflation-adjusted dollars from the US Census. Mann-Whitney U, T- and Chi-square tests were used to compare characteristics between the two groups.One hundred eight patients were analyzed. SoC VCB was delivered in 3, 4 and 5 fractions for 27/54 (50%), 11/54 (20%), and 16/54 (30%), respectively. Median total distance traveled per patient for SoC vs. experimental arms was 213 vs 137 miles (p = .12), and median cost of commute for patients was 36.3 vs 18.0 USD (p = .11). Compared to 2-fraction treatment, 5-fraction treatment resulted in longer travel distances (median 462 vs. 137 miles, p < 0.01) and increased travel costs (median 59.3 v. 18.0 USD, p = < 0.01). Median income by zip code for SoC v. experimental arms was 79,704 vs. 79,671 USD (p = 1.0). For SoC v. experimental arms, 11 (20%) vs 7 (13%) of patients had zip codes with median income in the lowest or second lowest quintiles (p = 0.5). Adjusted raw PCs per patient did not differ between SoC vs. experimental arms (9,159$ vs. 7,532$, p = 0.19). TechCs were significantly higher on the SoC arm (35,734$ vs. 24,696$ p = < 0.01), as were TotCs (44,892$ vs. 32,228$, p < 0.01;). Medicare-adjusted PCs, TechCs, and TotCs were higher for the SoC arm (Table 1).Two-fraction VCB resulted in fewer treatments per patient, reduced cost of travel compared to longer courses, and an adjusted reduction in healthcare expenditures compared to standard of care. Ongoing work will include assessment of patient-reported financial toxicities.