Long-term prognostic value of stress echocardiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease - Systematic review and meta-analysis

Ugochukwu Ihekwaba, Nils P. Johnson, Jungil Choi,Gianluigi Savarese,Nicola Orsini,Jeffrey Khoo,Iain B. Squire,Attila Kardos

European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging(2023)

引用 0|浏览7
暂无评分
摘要
Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Objective To evaluate the association between results of stress echocardiography and outcomes for patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data Sources Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library for clinical trials, PubMed, Web of Science, and Clinicaltrials. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Randomised controlled trials (RCT) evaluating long term outcome of SE in patients suspected of coronary artery disease. Data Synthesis A meta-analysis utilising the fixed effects model to evaluate evidence from recent RCT trials on SE or comparing SE to other non-invasive diagnostic modalities. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality, or cardiovascular death and non-fatal myocardial infarction. Positive SE result was defined as inducible ischaemia in at least 1 of the 16 left ventricular segments. Results Six trials fulfilled the search criteria. A total of 19477 subjects who underwent either pharmacological (Dobutamine or Dipyridamole) or treadmill SE were recruited in the meta-analysis with a median follow-up of 31 months (range 21–101). The mean age was 59 years, and 55% were male. Fifty six percent had hypertension, 48% dyslipidaemia, 33% history of smoking, 21% diabetes mellitus and 26% history of myocardial infarction. The overall annual event rate was 1.79% for the composite of all-cause mortality or cardiovascular death and non-fatal myocardial infarction and for death 1.82%. Positive SE result was associated with an increased risk of the composite outcome and death with an annual event rate of 1.98% vs 1.26%, Odds Ratio 1.99 (CI 1.75–2.26) and 3.59% vs. 0.93, Odds Ratio 2.06 (CI 1.80–2.35) for the composite outcome and death, respectively Figure A,B. Heterogeneity and inconsistency (Chi2 1.7 P= 0.89) were low. Imprecision was low in the composite outcomes, and the optimal information size was achieved across the studies. Conclusions In this meta -analysis positive SE results were associated with poorer long-term composite outcome of all-cause or cardiovascular mortality and non-fatal myocardial infarction as well as for death only. Figure. Composite of all-cause mortality or cardiovascular death and non-fatal myocardial infarction. (Abstract picture 1) All-cause or cardiovascular death. (Abstract picture 2)
更多
查看译文
关键词
stress echocardiography,coronary artery disease,prognostic value,systematic review,long-term,meta-analysis
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要