Analytical Validation of the PreciseDx Digital Prognostic Breast Cancer Test in Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Gerardo Fernandez, Jack Zeineh,Marcel Prastawa, Richard Scott,Abishek Sainath Madduri, Alexander Shtabsky,Shabnam Jaffer, Aaron Feliz,Brandon Veremis, Juan Carlos Mejias, Elizabeth Charytonowicz, Nataliya Gladoun, Giovanni Koll, Kristian Cruz, Doug Malinowski,Michael J. Donovan

CLINICAL BREAST CANCER(2024)

引用 0|浏览3
暂无评分
摘要
PDxBr is a digital test, which generates an artificial -intelligent tumor grade and phenotype utilizing morphometric features derived from H and E images of invasive breast cancer to predict outcome. Analytical validation of the image analysis platform including robust accuracy of cell type identification and tissue architecture composition, combined with test reproducibility and reliability, is a critical requirement for approval and clinical adoption. Background: PreciseDx Breast (PDxBr) is a digital test that predicts early -stage breast cancer recurrence within 6years of diagnosis. Materials and Methods: Using hematoxylin and eosin -stained whole slide images of invasive breast cancer (IBC) and artificial intelligence -enabled morphology feature array, microanatomic features are generated. Morphometr ic attr ibutes in combination with patient's age, tumor size, stage, and lymph node status predict disease free survival using a proprietary algorithm. Here, analytical validation of the automated annotation process and extracted histologic digital features of the PDxBr test, including impact of methodologic variability on the composite risk score is presented. Studies of precision, repeatability, reproducibility and interference were performed on morphology feature array -derived features. The final risk score was assessed over 20 -days with 2 -operators, 2-runs/day, and 2 -replicates across 8 -patients, allowing for calculation of within -run repeatability, between -run and within -laboratory reproducibility. Results: Analytical validation of features derived from whole slide images demonstrated a high degree of precision for tumor segmentation (0.98, 0.98), lymphocyte detection (0.91, 0.93), and mitotic figures (0.85, 0.84). Correlation of variation of the assay risk score for both reproducibility and repeatability were less than 2%, and interference from variation in hematoxylin and eosin staining or tumor thickness was not observed demonstrating assay robustness across standard histopathology preparations. Conclusion: In summary, the analytical validation of the digital IBC risk assessment test demonstrated a strong performance across all features in the model and complimented the clinical validation of the assay previously shown to accurately predict recurrence within 6 -years in early -stage invasive breast cancer patients.
更多
查看译文
关键词
(http,//creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) Artificial intelligent image analysis,PDxBr,Prognostic grade
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要