Using Ambient Pressure Photoelectron Spectroscopy to Investigate the Time Dependence of Electrostatic Potential Difference over the Interphase between an Electrode and an Electrolyte

Ambient pressure photoelectron spectroscopy (APPES) is a method well-suited for measuring the change ∆ φ in electrostatic potential difference φ over an interphase between an electronic conductor and an insulator. APPES had previously been used to compare ∆ φ over an interphase between an electrode and an electrolyte with the change in electrochemical potential difference ∆ U WE-RE between the working and the reference electrode U WE-RE .[1] The relationship between ∆ φ and ∆ U WE-RE at low current-transient had been shown to follow two distinct trends depending on whether charge transfer of Li + ions between an electrode and an electrolyte occurs or not.[1,2] In this work, APPES was used to investigate the time dependence of ∆ φ after changing U WE-RE . The studied electrochemical system consisted of Au (working electrode), Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 (reference electrode) and a second Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 (counter electrode) with 0.008 M LiClO 4 in propylene carbonate (PC) as the electrolyte. Pressure in the sample compartment was equal to the saturated PC pressure. APPES experiments were performed at HIPPIE beamline at MAX IV in Lund and were conducted as follows. After applying a potential step ∆ U WE-RE , a C 1s spectrum was measured every 7 s. Incident photon energy was 1800 eV. Each spectrum was fitted using a Python code written especially for the obtained C 1s spectra. Time dependence of ∆ φ was extracted from the shift in the kinetic energy ∆ KE of the C=O peak (∆ φ = ∆ KE ). Experiments were performed in both regimes, i.e. when the working electrode behaves as an ideal polarizable electrode and when it behaves as an ideal non-polarizable electrode, and have shown the time dependence of ∆ φ to differ for the two regimes. Behaviour of ∆ φ(t) as well as the experimental setup and spectral fitting using the Python code will be discussed. Figure 1: a) Schematic depiction of the electronic electrostatic potential φ between a working (WE) and a reference electrode (RE). Electrostatic potential profile is not to scale. b) An example of the experimentally obtained time dependence of the C=O peak kinetic energy KE(t). KE(t) is related to φ(t) as ∆ φ(t) = ∆ KE(t) . References: [1] Källquist, I. et al . Probing Electrochemical Potential Differences over the Solid/Liquid Interface in Li-Ion Battery Model Systems. ACS applied materials & interfaces 13 , 32989–32996 (2021). [2] Källquist, I. et al. Potentials in Li-Ion Batteries Probed by Operando Ambient Pressure Photoelectron Spectroscopy. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 14 , 6465-6475 (2021). Figure 1