The role of atrial electro-mechanical coupling as predictor of catheter ablation efficiency: EPs and clinicians working together

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) results in electrical and structural remodeling of the atria, and the extent of remodeling has already been found to be associated with higher AF recurrence rate after catheter ablation (CA). Recently, a novel echocardiographic parameter derived from tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), called PA-TDI, has been introduced to assess the total atrial activation time, as a non-invasive surrogate of fibrosis and atrial cardiomyopathy. The aim of the study was to investigate the role of PA-TDI interval as predictor of AF ablation efficacy. Methods Consecutive patients with persistent or paroxysmal symptomatic AF referred to our Center to perform radiofrequency ablation or cryoablation procedures were prospectively enrolled. In these patients, a complete transthoracic echocardiographic examination was performed before and after the ablation procedure, including assessment of the PA-TDI interval. Results From October 2018 to May 2020, 221 consecutive patients (mean age 61 ± 9 years, 74% male, mean BMI 26.5 ± 3.6, mean Ejection Fraction 61 ± 6%) symptomatic for AF, undergoing the procedure ablation (first procedure or re-do) were enrolled. Out of the blanking period, 25% of patients experienced recurrence of arrhythmia during follow-up (mean 16 months). Compared to patients who did not relapse, patients with AF recurrence have a generally longer post-procedural PA-TDI interval (139.6 ± 22.1 msec vs 153.9 ± 33 msec, respectively). In the multivariable analysis only post-procedure PA-TDI and re-do interventions were found to be independent predictors of AF recurrence. A PA-TDI cut-off>144msec identifies patients at risk of post ablation AF recurrence with sensitivity 58.7% and specificity 73.5% (AUC 0.697). Conclusions The PA-TDI interval is an independent predictor of AF recurrence after catheter ablation. This echocardiographic parameter is easily obtainable, low-cost, reproducible, and accessible even in peripheral centers.