Do we need to improve the general oral health of our population to reduce the risk of Infective Endocarditis?

Abstract Background Emphasis is placed on the link between oral health and Infective Endocarditis (IE), particularly around odontogenic infections and specific dental procedures. The Adult Dental Health Survey in 2009 showed 45% of adults in the UK required dental intervention typically associated with developing IE. Antibiotic prophylaxis in this context is not without controversy. With gum and periodontic disease endemic, is the modern issue one of generalised poor oral health as a risk factor for IE? Purpose To determine the impact of oral health on risk and outcome in IE. Terminology SDCEP published dental guidelines of when to consider AP against IE for dental procedures. It identifies dental procedures that can cause transient bacteraemia. Methodology Data were collected from October 2020-Januaury 2023 in 123 patients with confirmed IE at a central London cardiac surgical centre. Patients had a focussed dental assessment with history, intraoral examination and dental panoramic radiograph to determine the risk and extent of oral disease. Results Average age was 54.2years. 77/123 (63%) had native IE (NVE) and 46 (37%) prosthetic (PVE). 17 (37%) cultured oral organisms from blood (Table 1); 8 (47%) of these organisms are associated with active dental disease (decay, periodontal disease, dental infection). Organisms can be found in Table 2. However, 93/123 (76%) had oral caries requiring dental treatment, irrespective of typical portal of entry for that organism. The proposed dental treatment posed a high risk for causing IE in 70%. 93/123 (76%) needed further dental treatment within six months rendering only 12% of patients orally stable. Oral organisms were seen more frequently in NVE (41/77) vs PVE (17/46). There was no difference in the incidence of dental disease requiring treatment (77% NVE vs 74% PVE). Whilst 27% of PVE had had recent (within 4 months) dental treatment compared to 73% NVE, only 1 PVE patient grew an oral commensal compared to 82% of NVE patients. Conclusion Prevention of IE is key to reducing the morbidity and mortality of this disease. We see oral commensals causing IE in 47%, with only 12% of this modern IE cohort dentally stable. Despite this, there was no difference in rates of dental disease requiring invasive treatment when stratified by oral vs non-oral organisms. A robust public health strategy is required to reduce the risk of oral disease driving IE.